Duplicate documentation files / potentially conflicting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



End of August I've opened tickets about duplicate and potentially
conflicting (because if noarch <-> arch differences) %doc files.
The response from packagers has not been brilliant so far.

These are _package bugs_ specific to Fedora, so it's the responsibility
of a Fedora Packager to fix them. It's a mistake in the spec file, not
in the packaged software.

"Potentially conflicting" may mean that several subpackages could not
be installed at once and would cause a transaction error.

Rather than spamming bugzilla with lots of NEEDINFO calls, hereby I'd
like to raise awareness of the issue. I don't understand why packagers
don't respond in bugzilla. Fedora 20 is near.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux