Quoting Lukas Berk (2013-11-28 16:51:37) > Hey, > > * Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2013-11-27 11:28]: > > On 11/26/2013 03:13 AM, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: > > >Compose started at Tue Nov 26 05:15:08 UTC 2013 > > > > > >Broken deps for i386 > > >---------------------------------------------------------- > > >[openmpi] > > > openmpi-1.7.3-1.fc21.i686 requires libpapi.so.5.2.0.0 > > > > >Broken deps for x86_64 > > >---------------------------------------------------------- > > >[openmpi] > > > openmpi-1.7.3-1.fc21.i686 requires libpapi.so.5.2.0.0 > > > openmpi-1.7.3-1.fc21.x86_64 requires libpapi.so.5.2.0.0()(64bit) > > > > >papi-5.2.0-2.1.gff3e15d.fc21 > > >---------------------------- > > >* Mon Nov 25 2013 Lukas Berk <lberk@xxxxxxxxxx> - 5.2.0-2.1.gff3e15d > > >- Automated weekly rawhide release > > > > This strikes me as not a very good idea. We've now apparently > > tripped into early 5.3.0 territory without any warning. > > > > Provides > > libpapi.so.5.3.0.0()(64bit) > > > > Please don't. > > Sorry about the unintended breakage. I'm pushing a fix back to 5.2 in > rawhide now. In the future, how would you like to coordinate future papi > releases when the so version does need to be bumped? Generally, following Updates Policy[1] should be enough I'd say [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Rawhide_.2F_devel_.2F_master -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
