Re: [Base] Release cycle discussion for Fedora products and specifically Fedora Base and how they interact/align

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Hi everyone.

As i've been having a few discussions myself and following several of them as well as plans about release cycles in the different WGs over the past weeks and after FESCO discussed this in during their meetings and in a FESCO ticket[1] i get the feeling that we should be discussing this not in committees only but on a broader scale across all committees and WGs.

Congrats being the first of and in the WG's that essentially asks the community what they would/could maintain their package for a long period of time as opposed to have any or all of the WG's dictate/decide that for them...

JBG
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux