Am 21.11.2013 21:50, schrieb Stanislav Ochotnicky: > Regardless..what I meant to say: Nobody - as in I don't see anyone jumping up > and down and volunteering to do the work and maintain the code, provide ways to > workaround those inevitable false positives etc. I have asked and received a > clear "no" from people who actually work on OpenJDK codebase. If anybody things > they are smarted go ahead: prove them wrong and that is why metapackge "java" pulling "openjdk" and "openjdk-headless" woulkd be the right way because *nobody* would need volunteering because nothing changes until a single package which may be the only one on a server changes to "openjdk-headless" instead the full java that would not be a big win in the first step, but a cheap one but it can be a big win in case you have 20 servers using whatever java-package which does not really need the X11 parts and is the only one pulling the X11 dependency tree, it would require only a single RFE for that package anybody else out there would see any imapct in any direction why is it that hard to go *small* and *pragmatic* steps instead always try to change the world at once? P.S: that said from one not using any single java-package any longer on servers but carried the openjdk for qenta-qtill payment over years with *a lot* of useless dependencies called by a webserver with surely no X11 dependency
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
