On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:20:30PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:29:06PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 01:39:50PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
> > > We have to learn fedpkg to do all the magic ;-) Something like
> > >
> > > add remote git tree with exploded tree:
> > >
> > > fedpkg exploded-tree add ssh://git.fedorahosted.org/git/foo.git
> >
> > This is all great, but the problem is that co-maintainers and
> > provenpackagers need to be (automatically if possible) added to the
> > fedorahosted tree. Otherwise there's a big extra step for them if
> > they want to follow the package owner's preferred patching system.
BTW, why we cannot use pkgs.fedoraproject.org for exploded tree too?
Just another set of repositories, maybe with a different HTTP alias,
e.g. extree.fedoraproject.org, or so...
> Ideally the GIT SCM request added to bugzilla when reviews are
> approved would have a "Upstream GIT URL" option and would setup
> a clone of this, and create branches for the fedora releases,
> and apply the same permissioning model from dist-git branches
> of the same names.
All such information belong to spec file :-)
Fedora-SCM:
Upstream-SCM:
Exploded-tree-SCM:
for example upstream SCM URL is already missing in our spec files,
it's more important information than URL to tarball.
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@xxxxxxxxxx>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
