Re: Using git for patch management in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 02:42:00PM +0400, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2013/11/19 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > 2013/11/19 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> >> Peter, is the comment in the spec file wrong?  It refers to two github
> >> repos:
> >>
> >> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/erlang.git/tree/erlang.spec#n46
> >
> > Oops, thanks for pointing me on this. Yes, that's just leftover and
> > should be removed. And the entire patch generation process should be
> > greatly simplified. Patches are welcome btw :)
> >
> >> In any case, fedorahosted would be an improvement, but AIUI it doesn't
> >> automatically give access to co-maintainers and proven packagers.
> >
> > Yes indeed. Our infrastructure lacks proper integration. What should I
> > do to add you into giterlang group?
> 
> Ok, just figured it out by myself.

Thanks.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux