Re: [Fedora-packaging] Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-11-14 17:00 UTC)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 06:39:25AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> Ticket #350 needs 2 votes on final decision.
>>
>> Please consider.
>>
> What would help is if you could add to the ticket what makes this different
> from the situation of rsync bundling zlib or similar.  In order to be fair
> to packagers, we try to either follow precedent in these cases or change the
> guidelines so that old rejections would know that they could re-apply for an
> exception if needed.

Quoted:

"Currently haven't voted: Rathann, tibbs"

So please let the rest part of committee to finish voting first. 4:3
with 2 not available, I'm not sure what I could do here.

To me about this package, well, I think the comment 5 from the author
is very clear. It needs antlr but the orginial sources doesn't work in
the way he wants, and will be, never, so he modified the sources.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux