On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:14:44PM -0500, James Antill wrote: > > = Followups = > > (approval and retirement sections already passed) > #topic #339 software collections in Fedora > .fpc 339 > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/339 > I'm sorry, I don't think I'm going to get to anything new in the draft this week as I'm having to work on talking to FHS about potential to modify /opt. > (waiting on spot's input) > #topic #352 BLAS and LAPACK packaging > .fpc 352 > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/352 > > #topic #355 How to package noarch packages which require a binary > dependency which doesn't build on all archs? > .fpc 355 > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/355 > > #topic #357 time-api prior to openJDK8 > .fpc 357 > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/357 > > = New business = > FESCo was asked about enabling of third party repositories by the three Products. notting pointed out that the present policy is actually encoded in a Packaging Guideline rather than in a FESCo Policy. So we'll need to discuss this so FESCo knows where we stand on it: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/366 -Toshio
Attachment:
pgplr2A1SQ8Tk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
