Re: OpenH264 in Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Björn Persson
<bjorn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>>Well you make it sound like that had any effect on the outcome but the
>>slides say that Fedora and Debian simply do not matter.
>
> Whose slides?
>
> I guess you meant this one:
> http://webrtcis.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/img_2881.jpeg

Yeah.

> That was Jonathan Rosenberg from Cisco arguing that WebRTC can succeed
> even if operating systems don't ship the mandatory codec. Presumably he
> tried to convince the audience that browsers will either bundle or
> auto-download Cisco's OpenH264.
>
> Cisco doesn't control the IETF you know.

They don't but that does not mean that there statement is wrong or
that others do not agree with it. Anyway my point was rather in order
to promote freedom we need a larger userbase, which is a wakeup call
for people that keep arguing "who cares about users" etc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux