On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 02:04:30PM +0800, Peeyush Gupta wrote: > Hi all, > > In relation to the change proposed here : > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant, I was wondering why > aren't we using libvirt plugin instead of KVM plugin? The thing is > libvirt is used more commonly than KVM, and could result in better > implementation. Is there any specific reason for using KVM plugin? The 'vagrant-kvm' plugin does in fact appear to use libvirt, and targets only KVM. see the readme & code here: https://github.com/adrahon/vagrant-kvm The 'vagrant-libvirt' plugin also uses libvirt and also targets only QEMU/KVM. https://github.com/pradels/vagrant-libvirt So, AFAICT, both vagrant plugins target the same virt scenario. I've no idea why they need two separate impls of the same thing.... a question for their respective upstream authors I guess. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
