On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:12:34 +0100, Branislav Blaskovic wrote: > yes, you are right with ImageMagic - no doubt. I don't want to support the idea > of this thread but there are many of apps which are made for terminal but users > are running them mostly without arguments. For example - irssi, BitchX, mc, > newsbeuter, alsamixer(I am still using the cli one), mutt(kind of), alpine, > nethack, and others. Of course - you can run it with arguments but regular user > who uses that GUI tool to install apps will not use its arguments for first > run. The problem is that a user may search for "an email program". With certain normal expectations (such as a graphical interface). And it gets really tedious, if to the user a long list of programs is displayed, which contains Curses-based programs or even CLI tools like mailx. I hope the screenshots and features apps in programs like gnome-software will serve as a good hint. Perhaps packagers will add screenshots for terminal based programs however, and then for the user that would be more stuff to wade through again, and the user may want to filter out CLI tools. -- I just noticed ELM is not included within the package collection anymore. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
