On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 03:21:04PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Hey, I read your minutes, and discussed some of my thoughts on this with > my workstation wg peers. Basically, I think that defining a 'base' as a > particular set of packages (minimal install, or some variant thereof) > does not really provide us what we need to build one or more products.' > > What we really need as a base is a definition of the apis that are > guaranteed to be stable and that the products and applications can rely > on. Packages can to some extent serve as a proxy for that, but they are > really just an implementation detail of how the product is put > together. +1 to this. In fact, I think we'll *need* to do it this way in order to be able to innovate at both layers. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
