On Mon, 2004-11-08 at 14:30, Thomas Vander Stichele wrote:
> The next hurdle is the dev rpm of FC2 checking /proc/mounts and deciding
> it won't install because there's a devfs mounted.
>
> I'm not yet sure how I should tackle that. I could go back to not
> mounting proc but that will give me lots of other errors. Or, I could
> start overriding calls like open, but that's pretty hackish.
I've been building with mach on a devfs enabled box for a while. On
that box I'm forced to resort to some dirty hacks to get things to work
but it boils down to mounting devfs (for FC3->FC2 that'll be udev
instead) onto the buildroots /dev. Then rpm -ivh --justdb'ing the dev
rpm onto the buildroot between doing a mach setup base and mach setup
build.
It's very ugly but it might be more workable from within mach itself.
Then again, it doesn't give you a 100% true representation of what's in
the dev package on FC2....
-Toshio
--
_______S________U________B________L________I________M________E_______
t o s h i o + t i k i - l o u n g e . c o m
GA->ME 1999
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
