Re: unaccessability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi


On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Christian Schaller  wrote:
Hi,
The core principle of the installer is that it operates on an application level and not a package level. The current way it determines if something is an application
 is by looking for a .desktop file. So in theory you could put a bitchx.desktop file  into the bitchx package and it would appear in the installer. That said I don't
think it is generally a bad idea if command line/terminal applications are installed from the command line, but there is no hard policy blocking such applications from making themselves available in the installer.

It might be a good idea to rethink this strategy.  I don't have a problem with using yum but I am not going to fire up the installer just for gui packages and fall back to command line to install command line applications.  It is a confusing approach.   Perhaps instead of ignoring them entirely, you can just sort the results or having a secondary view "Click here for command line applications that match your search results"  etc can be considered.

Rahul
 

A thought as we move into the future: if we continue with the installer, end users may one day forget about the yum command and all the awesome packages out there; they may forget about the command line altogether.

Richard
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux