Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 01:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > * and *ideally* I mean SELinux sanbdboxed with specific APIs that must
>> > be used to interact with the rest of the system, so that the
>> > application doesn't have free reign over users files.
>>
>> So you want to remove my freedom to disable SELinux? <SARCASM>Way to go…
>> </SARCASM>
>
> If this is all you have to say about what I wrote (strawman on a note
> and ignore completely the rest) you have nothing valid to say in this
> discussion.
If the system relies on SELinux to sandbox apps, it means that SELinux
becomes mandatory to use it, which definitely does remove my freedom to
disable it. So where's the strawman?
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
