Re: Rawhide nodebug and the 3.12 kernel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2013-11-06 at 15:42 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:39 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 12:30:37 -0800,
> >   Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> FWIW the ship has probably sailed now, but I really don't think it'd be
> >> much of a problem to have 3.12 in F20 at release time. It's what I've
> >> been running on my F20 box here for the last several weeks anyway, and
> >> based on my testing it's unlikely to cause us any particular problems.
> >
> >
> > I asked about this last week and the kernel devs didn't feel comfortable
> > about switching after beta or trying to get a freeze exception to get 3.12
> > into beta.
> 
> Right.  Also, at this point I'm not sure what 3.12 actually buys us
> over a known 3.11.
> 

It makes the sound on my laptop work. THAT SHOULD BE REASON ENOUGH! ;)
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux