The term 'Power user' is not meaningless if you use it to refer to users of Fedora on IBM Power architecture ;) But apart from that I do agree that the term as generally used doesn't provide a very clear target for development. Christian ----- Original Message ----- > From: "drago01" <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 6:53:15 AM > Subject: Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Nicolas Mailhot > <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Le Lun 4 novembre 2013 23:02, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > > > >> The problem is not to get code in the hands of developers. You don't need > >> distros for that. The problem is to get the code to end-users and > >> developers spend more time fighting the constrains it involves than trying > >> to understand this problem-space. > >> > >> Of course the aim might not be to reach end users but to push code from > >> developpers to other developers. > > > > And if that is the case, there is a huge disconnect between GNOME goals > > and Fedora Workstation goals. GNOME speakers repeat all year round their > > software is not aimed at "power users", but developers are the über power > > user. > > Depends on what you mean by "power user" (I hate this meaningless > term) if it means "software developer" then > yes. If it means "someone that spends his whole day in config dialogs" then > no. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
