On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I don't think we'd really be correct in blocking the release for such > > issues - especially not Beta. We used to have 'polish' criteria for > > Final which at least required the icons used in the system menus - i.e. > > what's specified in the app's .desktop file - to be sane for all > > installed applications, but we dropped that (and other polish criteria) > > with the F19/F20 criteria re-write on the basis that they were really > > stretching a bit too far and would be unlikely to hold up to a 'last > > blocker before release' acid test. Stuff like this doesn't break > > anyone's use of the system catastrophically and can reasonably be fixed > > with updates. > > But it also affects the live images (making them look very unpolished) and > we don't respin those. That's why I said 'reasonably' not 'perfectly' :) I can see an argument for blocking Final, though in practice, I don't think our current standards are such that it really makes sense to claim our final releases are so smooth as to be worth enforcing a high standard of polish via the blocker mechanisms. But certainly for Beta it seems too trivial. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
