On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:20:44 -0800, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If it is the case that fedora will not utilize this option (or another to obtain h264 support) and you care about avoiding an outcome where Fedora is unable to claim conformance with the spec, then someone probably ought to comment about this to the working group. Commenting to the WG list may not change the working group's outcome, commenting here surely won't.
I have asked on the advisory-board list about getting an official Fedora position on OpenH264 before the vote occurs. I don't want to be making claims about Fedora on my own on how far Fedora will or won't go in supporting OpenH264. (This could in theory affect our ability to use the Firefox trademark if we block its ability to download that codec from Cisco. Assuming that the download is implemented in Firefox.)
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
