On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 22:00 +0100, Farkas Levente wrote: > > mysql-4.1.7-3 > > ------------- > > Fri Oct 29 2004 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> 4.1.7-3 > > - Handle ldconfig more cleanly (put a file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/). > > > > Thu Oct 28 2004 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> 4.1.7-2 > > - rebuild in devel branch > > > > Wed Oct 27 2004 Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxx> 4.1.7-1 > > - Update to MySQL 4.1.x. > > untill now everyone with with @redhat.com email address said that the > reason of not including mysql in fc3 and rhel4 is license issue. noting > changed! so those reason was just a for us:-((( As Seth said, don't be silly with conspiracy theories. It was a mad rush before freeze date, and legal at red hat had to handle mysql's licensing, and the bottom line is, they did fix it. MySQL's licensing _did_ change Getting Tom to package it so late in the release cycle might've lead to breakages for FC3 mysql users, so from a release engineering perspective, this made all the sense. Wait for FC4 to come out And yes, I'm also not an @redhat.com (and all conspiracy theorists should stop whinging over @redhat.com's as well on list - it gets rather annoying, for both the onlookers and the @redhat's I'm sure) -- Colin Charles, byte@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.bytebot.net/ "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win." -- Mohandas Gandhi
