On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:09:28 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > If anyone feels like adding an option to rpmdev-bumpspec, that one could > > attempt at cleaning up Release tags -- but note that even least-significant > > stuff right of the dist tag could be wanted by the package owner(s), so > > simply dropping it might be wrong. E.g. sometimes it's a patchlevel number, > > with no "pl" prefix. > > I took a quick look at the code because I had a related issue, and > found that rpmdev-bumpspec offers a workaround. If the release tag is > too complicated, you can extract the "bumpable" part into a > 'baserelease' macro. The linked spec is an example where rpmdev-bumpspec does _not_ know what to do because of the %rhel macro in the Release tag. As a result, the tag will be bumped at the very right side only. > This is what I've done [1] for a package to handle the epel '0.' > prefix mentioned in the guidelines. Where to find that in the guidelines? Such a prefix sounds questionable and is news to me (not being an EPEL dev). > Dridi > > [1] https://bitbucket.org/dridi/fedora_packages/downloads/numatop-el6.spec -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
