Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Schaller wrote:
> The PRD avoids these questions by design. To often open source discussions
> end up being discussions about the merits of the means as opposed to the
> actual goals.

Well, I disagree about the basic decision of whether we want a standard 
desktop UI or something, uh, "different", being only "about the merits of 
the means".

> It should be a sobering notion that for all the years when the community
> discussed if the a successful desktop should be implemented in C or C++ we
> ended up having our collective thunder stolen by a desktop written in
> Objective-C.

That really didn't have anything to do with the merits of Objective C, or 
even of the desktop, but only with marketing. If Objective C were that 
great, we'd all be using GNUstep.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux