On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 16:10:02 +0000 (UTC), Andre Robatino wrote: > In F16, when I had 32-bit packages (namely Skype and Fedora's wine) > installed, I had both openssl.i686 and openssl.x86_64 installed, so Indeed. Up to F17, but not anymore since F18: http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/updates/17/x86_64/ http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/18/x86_64/ > openssl.i686 is pulled in, directly or indirectly, by either Skype or wine. > It's easy to find out which one by trying to remove openssl.i686 to see what > it wants to remove with it. The 32-bit Skype rpm (for F16?) doesn't depend on "openssl". But watch this on F20 x86_64: # repoquery --releasever=17 --exactdeps --whatrequires 'openssl(x86-32)' openssl-devel-1:1.0.0i-1.fc17.i686 openssl-devel-1:1.0.0k-1.fc17.i686 So, openssl-devel.i686 required openssl.i686 directly. There have been packaging changes/fixes related to that. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
