Hi, On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The other positions will be filled by general election > every two years. As a special exception, four seats will be filled in > one year, with those positions chosen at random (unless some number of > members decide to step down). Voting will follow the standard Fedora > election process and be open to all contributors in the CLA+1 group. > > In the event that a current member relinquishes their seat, that seat > will be filled by the first runner up in the previous election. If > that person is not able or willing to fill the seat, it will go to > each successive runner up until the seat is filled. I think, I personally, would rather see the previous working group decide new members of the working group. They're the ones doing the work, so they should get the most say in the direction the work goes. (the whole "fedora is a meritocracy not a democracy" thing). Put another way: I don't think someone who works on desktop related software should have much say in who gets to be put in the cloud working group, or vice-versa. Let the people already doing the work decide the continuing direction of the work. If things really get off course, fesco can intervene, but I don't think that will happen. --Ray -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
