-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 10/27/2013 07:34 AM, Nobrakal wrote: > 2013/10/27, Frank Murphy <frankly3d@xxxxxxxxx>: >> On Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:05:37 +0800 Christopher Meng >> <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> It seems that most of members from the new formed groups are >>> working for Red Hat. Well it's helpful to strengthen our >>> technical base but are there any plots for other people? > > Well, if I believe this ticket [1]: "Each working group should be > comprised of no more than half (rounded up) of Red Hat employees. > This is to avoid the misconception that Red Hat is dictating the > planning here. " That a good rule. > I suggested that (and in the Server WG I tried to meet it), but the simple truth was that this was impossible for most of the WGs because there were fewer than four non-Red Hat self-nominees. I do think that the other FESCo coordinators attempted to balance the Red Hat and non-Red Hat voices as best as possible. Certainly, the nominees are not the only people that can participate in this process. As I stated for the Server WG, the voting members are only there to rule on final decisions and resolve disputes. If they are the only ones working towards these goals, we've failed. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlJuULcACgkQeiVVYja6o6NltACggJ51skJh7WES1kPBGEirl9Ky Yq0Anix7uwpsscd5ofhNfBOsVTuUp9Ye =xneg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
