Re: [Ambassadors] Ambassadors places in new Working Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I think that coordinators and Fesco tried to integrate as much as possible community members.
But truth is that most people who self-nominated were RH employees, so i'd rather say that RH employees even had an handicap.

As for the Cloud WG -i can't speak for other WG-, we wish that non-voting members are integrated as much as possible in defining the future
of Fedora in the clouds. We can't do everything and we don't intend to close the door to anyone.
Remember that we're just kickstarting a major overhaul on how we think and build Fedora, these WG are only there to
lead the definition of our products in the open and keep the process focused.

Either i would have been appointed into the Cloud WG or not, i would have participated anyway in that effort.

H.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux