Re: Ambassadors places in new Working Groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2013/10/27, H. Guémar <hguemar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your concern on that topic, off course, fedora.next would be an
> half-assed
> initiative if we forget communication and community mgmt. And i'm pretty
> sure that
> everyone here agrees with you on that point.
>
> As for myself, I also intend to represent "users" inside the Cloud WG, so

Yes, that the most important point, represent user.

> i'll be glad to
> serve as a liaison officer with both Ambassadors and Marketing groups.
> I can't speak on the behalf of cwickert, but as one of the most supportive
> member of the
> Ambassadors group, I'm confident that he'll do an outstanding job -as
> usual- on that matter

I have no doubt about cwickert and you, that sure!
But, neither email was sent on the ambassador mailing list, so, this mail is more a reminder to not forget communication and community management (I like your _expression_ :) ).

@frankly3d:

>Why does the user need a middleman,
>who in this instance is a distraction.
>from his (user) talk of code to a dev also code.

Users don't need a middle man, yes. But, during the event, some people talk to you about problem, or others things in the project. Ambassadors is just a link. As hguemar has said, we musn't forget communicaton people

>
> best regards,
> H.
>

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux