On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > So, is this Review request still "live" and waiting for a reviewer, > or is is "dead", and waiting for a new prospective maintainer? > It would be great if the involved parties could provide some hints. Dead de facto. But it has many comaintainers. I hope we can finish this review but unfortunately J5 is not working on this area now, thusly we need someone else. Essentially, this package should get an update first as the latest version was released in 2011, then we can see if it's possible to change its name. But now as name change bug has been posted for years(from f15 era, then dup of this one), we should think about both simultaneously. All comaintainers of this package are not willing to do that: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/pycairo alexl caillon caolanm hadess mclasen rhughes rstrode ssp xiphmont This package is pretty old comparing with other distros, this is not bleeding edge but really need an update. And if someone want to set python3 as default interpreter, you will find Fedora doesn't have its py3 version, which is also being required by at least these on py2.x version: bkchem dogtail gnome-activity-journal gnome-desktop graphite-web gtg icaro labyrinth lv2-fil-plugins pitivi pycairo-devel pygobject3 pygtk2 python-cairosvg python-matplotlib python-pycha python-xdot yumex So? I don't know. I hope some people like rhughes/hadness(who is of course alive and has commit acl, too) can update it. But I think my words are tiny. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Fєdоґa ї₴ al$о a кїпd оf нaт lїкє Яёd Haт. http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
