On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 14:01 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Hi folks, and welcome to the Fedora 20 Beta blocker bug news... > > can't find any criteria currently that covers application icons (though do > mention it if such a thing exists)... > > At issue here are gtk3 applications that use non-standard (e.g. symbolic) > icons look particularly bad on kde (or any desktop that doesn't use an icon > theme that has does not have a fallback to gnome icon theme). See: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018390 (*) > (includes screenshot), reported over a week ago without comment yet, so here > am, soliciting feedback. > > If gtk applications need a gnome-icon-theme fallback to be fully functional, > then depending on the currently configured icon theme to do it feels like > the wrong approach to me. > > Kevin (Kofler) and I provided what I think are constructive and not > unreasonable suggestions: > * restore Net/FallbackIconTheme support > * use a hard-coded gnome-icons fallback (instead of hicolor) > > In particular, adding a hard-coded fallback to gnome-icons in kde is not a > particularly pleasing option (as mentioned in the bug already). Did you try with gtk 3.10.1 ? We've fixed the 'generic fallback' to drop -symbolic after exhausting other possibilities. E.g. for drive-harddisk-usb-symbolic we're now looking for drive-harddisk-usb-symbolic drive-harddisk-symbolic drive-symbolic drive-harddisk-usb drive-harddisk drive in that order. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
