On Sun, 20 Oct 2013 22:12:15 +0200, Johan Swensson wrote: > Hi list, > > I am not currently a sponsored maintainer but have submitted a few > review requests[1][2] as well as a proposed update to the acpi package[3]. > > The acpi package have not been updated in a while and I would like to > offer to help out in any way that I can. > In my first request[1] I have put some links to comments I have left on > other review requests for anyone who wants to take a look. > > Regards > Johan > > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012391 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020014 > [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988181 I've put you on my bugzilla watch-list earlier this evening and will take a look at the comments/reviews and review requests you've made. If not later tonight already, tomorrow. Package "acpi" is owned by somebody, who hasn't left a single comment on all the open bug reports for it for a very long time, unfortunately. http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/acpi The non-responsive maintainer procedure has been started and interrupted before, this year in May: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/963890 That's not good. -- Michael Schwendt Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug) - Linux 3.12.0-0.rc5.git3.2.fc21.x86_64 loadavg: 0.04 0.12 0.13 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
