Hello, On Sat, 19 Oct 2013, Reindl Harald wrote: > what is needed to be resolved? > > my SPEC file is removing all the things i do not need and > not things with bugs to solve - the reason why i build it > myself honestly since years is that the fedora packages > are way too often outdated if you would be fair and compare my GIT commit or the Fedora Bodhi update timestamps, you would note that this is not true, neither for Fedora, nor for Fedora EPEL. The update of phpMyAdmin happened usually between a few less minutes after the upstream announcement or at latest a few less days after. Neither nor can be IMHO treated as "often outdated". If you complain that the package usually takes 7-14 days to enter Fedora stable repository, then you are right. But I also can not remember, that you *ever* added some karma in Bodhi for phpMyAdmin. Nor can I remember that you ever filed a RHBZ complaining about a non up-to-date phpMyAdmin. Please think about that...before complaining about my efforts over years now. > the rpm-SPEC does not more and not less than package the upstream > source in a rpmpackage as it is Just have a look to your rm(1) calls: Some of the stuff that you are just removing for your own package needs to be unbundled for Fedora. And that means that these libraries/software need to be packaged as own RPMs. And crippling phpMyAdmin by just removing functionalities does not help users, too. Users are using phpMyAdmin due its tons of functionalities like the PDF export for example. Greetings, Robert
Attachment:
pgpmDXJY2T2jp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
