Re: prelink performance gains

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> If it doesn't appear to provide a significant benefit, and there's no
>> expectation of support (for some meaning of "support"), it should go
>> away.  IMHO this is one of the differences between a "distribution" and
>> a "random collection of packages".
>
> We need both (although I'd chose a more positive adjective than 'random'),
> and a way to draw the line.

Users may need both; we are supposedly producing a distribution, i.e.
not the other thing.
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux