On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 10:54:44AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > >>There's no reason to kill the package entirely. Some people still > >>want to use it despite the current issues. So just don't install it > >>by default. Reducing everything down to absolutes isn't helpful. > > > >Agreed, there's no reason to kill it entirely. Let people opt-in if > >they wish to install it later & understand the cost/benefit tradeoff. > > How do we make it go away on the installs it currently affects badly? > > Do we add Conflict: to some packages (eg FIPS capable ones) ? I don't think the downsides are critical enough to play games to force its removal on existing installs being upgraded. Suffice to just not install it on newly provisioned installs. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
