Re: aarch64 support bugs obsolete?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2013-10-17 04:30, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
On 10/16/2013 07:15 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
If your package uses the %configure macro, I would feel free to close
them as either invalid or fixed as that macro handles it.  If your
package doesn't, you have more checking/work to do.

Thanks for replying- this slipped through my inbox. You can also see if your package was built successfully by visiting http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/http://arm-temp.ausil.us/pub/fedora-arm/stage4/ - If the are rpms in the subdir of your package name, it probably means your package is good to go. The only exception is if there is a ".x1" (or x2, x3, x4) in the NVR- in which case we added some patches to make it build.

Hm, I get 404 on that URL?!

--alec
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux