Re: Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16.10.2013 18:13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
sope or something like that. Is that not the case?
The only change I needed for GNUStep was applied to Fedora [1]. Now, everything works fine from what I see (though my current setup is not terribly complex). Obviously, more testing is more than welcome :)
For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from SOGo's own repository, not the
2.0.7 version you have packaged.. And what's the real upstream for SOPE?
sogo.nu or http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/source/index.html ?
That also confused me. Ultimately I ended up looking at the release dates (SOPE-2.0.7 from [2] was released 23 Jul 2013, sope-4.7.1 from opengroupware was released 01 Jul 2007). Plus, I also had a look at what debian did, and they packaged 2.0.7 from sogo.


Sandro

[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005328
[2] http://www.sogo.nu/files/downloads/SOGo/Sources/
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux