Re: Software management: Call for RFEs results!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 16.10.2013 10:04, Jan Zelený napsal(a):
On 15. 10. 2013 at 09:40:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +0200, Jan Zelený wrote:
Not to be only negative here, take a look at the COPR initiative, I expect
it will solve the problem you are talking about by offering external
repositories that will be easily reachable from Fedora but won't be a part
of the Fedora itself. The content of these repositories will be governed
by the same law as Fedora packages are (SW patents, ...) but technical
policies should be a lot less strict.
Would that address your concerns?
I won't speak for Michael, but I think the answer is no. COPRs fills a need,
but it's _too_ wild west (no package signatures, for example). We need to
support multiple language runtimes and native upstream packaging *in*
Fedora.
Ok then, talk to FPC about this.

Sorry, this has nothing to do with FPC yet. RPM/YUM/DNF should first provide reasonable support. For example this issue [1] could take us closer as a first approximation.

Vít


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845247
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux