Re: packaging guidelines again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Reindl,

On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 12:15:02PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> i get somehow tired to report bugs for several packages,
> refresh them at each release because maintainers
> ignore guidelines all the time
> 
> some of them responded and fixed their packages
> some insist to ignore them

thank you for your work. Can you please add pointers to the respective
bug reports so that this can be escalated to FESCo?

> [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ checksec --proc-all | grep "No PIE"
>                X  21342 Partial RELRO     Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
>            login  26045 Partial RELRO     Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
>          alsactl    642 Partial RELRO     Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
>            mdadm    651 Partial RELRO     Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
>          upowerd    704 Partial RELRO     Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
>     avahi-daemon    705 Partial RELRO     Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
>     rtkit-daemon    718 Partial RELRO     Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
>       pulseaudio    869 Full RELRO        Canary found           NX enabled    No PIE
> 

Also it would be nice if you ask FESCo to update the list at
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Hardened_Packages
to include the packages you noticed are missing there.

Regards
Till
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux