RE: %ifarch note

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Oct 11, 2013 1:55 PM, "Mamoru TASAKA" <mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might.
> > If your package has:
> >
> > BuildArch: noarch
> >
> > It will set %{_target_cpu} to "noarch".
> >
> > If you also use %ifarch in that spec file, you might be expecting it to
> > match %{_arch} (the architecture of the build server). It does not. It
> > matches %{_target_cpu}.
> >
> > If you need to conditionalize on the value of %{_arch} in such a spec
> > file, you need to do it explicitly:
> >
> > %if %{_arch} == x86_64 || %{_arch} == i686
> >
> > Hope that helps other folks,
> >
> > ~tom
>
> Using %if %{_arch} == x86_64 || %{_arch} == i686 seems to break building srpm
> on arm koji:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6049393
> (when making srpm on i686 or x86_64, it seems okay).
>
> Perhaps when building srpm on arm, _arch is not defined on koji.
>
> Regards,
> Mamoru

Till just told me about %ifnarch %{arm}.
Is it better?

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux