Dave Johansen wrote:
> That's good to hear because it's always good to have options, but newer
> versions just bring up the question of a "moving target". Just like how
> you mentioned 1.54, if we're shooting for newer versions, then why not go
> with that one, or 1.55 after it? The point of RHEL is a stable platform
> and development environment and chasing the newest version of a library
> (especially one as volatile as Boost) just doesn't seem to fit the RHEL
> mentality.
But shipping old stuff that happens to match the version in RHEL doesn't fit
the Fedora mentality.
-1 to a boost141 compat package that nothing in Fedora needs!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
