On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:38 PM, M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Oct 2013, Dan Williams wrote: > >> On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 08:42 -0600, Jerry James wrote: >>> >>> Do you remember when I ranted about lack of communication between >>> provenpackagers and the maintainers of the packages they touch [1]? >>> Here is another case of lack of communication between people touching >>> the same package. >>> >>> On Aug 8, Zeeshan Ali built gnome-boxes-3.8.4-1.fc19 and submitted >>> update FEDORA-2013-14567. >>> >>> On Aug 9, Christophe Fergeau built gnome-boxes-3.8.4-2.fc19. Instead >>> of editing the existing update, Christophe chose to create a competing >>> update, FEDORA-2013-14530. >> >> >> Seems like there's something wrong with Bodhi here, because every time I >> create an update when there's already an older update pending, Bodhi >> obsoletes the old one and adds all the bugs from the old one to the new >> update. Even if somebody else filed the older update and I'm creating >> the new one. AFAIK, normal procedure is that you *don't* edit the old >> update at all, but each package NVR should get a new Bodhi update (so >> Christophe was correct in creating a new "competing" one) but that Bodhi >> takes care of obsoleting the old one. > > > I have had this sort of thing happening to me a few times. From what I > remember, Bodhi doesn't seems to obsolete packages that are in the pending > state for updates-testing, so if you submit a new build within a day or so > of the previous one (for example if a security update comes out just after > another build) then bodhi may not obsolete the older build automatically. This sounds broken ... have you filed a bodhi ticket? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
