On Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:27:33 +0200 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in > > f20+rawhide, for whatever reasons. > > Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not complain. > > There are no AutoQA comments in that bodhi ticket at all. Almost as if > AutoQA has not been run for that update. Normally it would add a > comment also for PASSED tests. Dan mentioned this later in the thread but I wanted to add a bit more information. There was a bug in AutoQA [1] that prevented comments on updates but didn't interfere with the checks being run. That bug has been fixed but most updates submitted before that fix was pushed to production on 2013-09-30 will probably not get comments from AutoQA until they are submitted for stable and more checks are run. [1] https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/444 All of the results are available through the resultsdb frontend, though: http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend I can have all of the checks re-run for f18, f19 and f20 updates-testing to add the bodhi comments that should have been added but I'd rather not spam maintainers unless there's enough desire to have the comments in bodhi. Tim
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
