On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 15:09:24 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > > > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 19:11:41 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > > > >> I now see ... the version in f19 was greater than that in f20+rawhide, > >> for whatever reasons. > >> Actually, I wonder why AutoQA did not complain. > > > > There are no AutoQA comments in that bodhi ticket at all. Almost as if > > AutoQA has not been run for that update. Normally it would add a comment > > also for PASSED tests. > > Is AutoQA enabled globally yet? It isn't anymore? It used to be. > Last I knew, it was an opt-in service. Where may I read about that? I've searched a bit, found some old blog posts, but couldn't locate the programs they referred to, such as autoqa-optin. "yum search autoqa" -> No matches found Search a bit more, found this http://jlaska.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/ but following the instructions, they are out-of-date and don't report settings that match reality. It lists "devel F-16 F-17" as available releases, but there have been AutoQA comments for a recent update of "audacious" for F-19. And the package is not listed as "opted in" for that release either. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
