On Fri, 4 Oct 2013 08:55:38 +0200 Simone Caronni <negativo17@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Check ok on my side: > > $ wget http://linux.dell.com/dkms/permalink/dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz > --2013-10-04 08:54:36-- > http://linux.dell.com/dkms/permalink/dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz > Resolving linux.dell.com (linux.dell.com)... 143.166.224.62 > Connecting to linux.dell.com (linux.dell.com)|143.166.224.62|:80... > connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 86053 (84K) [application/x-gzip] > Saving to: ‘dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz’ > > 100%[======================================>] 86,053 96.3KB/s > in 0.9s > > 2013-10-04 08:54:42 (96.3 KB/s) - ‘dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz’ saved > [86053/86053] slaanesh:BADSOURCE:dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz:dkms - BADSOURCE:$SOURCENAME:$PACKAGENAME This means that the source was downloaded ok from the upstream site, but doesn't match the md5sum given in the sources file. This could be due to needing to strip out content that fedora cannot ship (but in that case you shouldn't have the full URI in the Source line). Or upstream following poor release practices and updating without changing their release. % cat sources 1bf726e59d24854cc6260522b444c8d3 dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz % md5sum dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz 11a8aaade2ebec2803653837c7593030 dkms-2.2.0.3.tar.gz So, somehow the one uploaded to our lookaside is not the same as the upstream one. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
