On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Rolf Fokkens wrote: > Hi, > > For bcache the issue seems to be resolved by renaming the 61-bcache.rules > file to 65-bcache.rules file because it's processed after 64-md-raid.rules > which calls blkid. Renaming the file however impacts dracut: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1014625 > > > So in the end the issue is solved for bcache-tools. Relying on other rules > works for bcache-tools, but I have no idea in general. For me the > structure of the rules is not entirely clear. I can concur, udev rules need some cleanup or high-level reorganization. I've hit the exact some problem when I submitted btrfs rules to dracut. They were run too early, too. Harald had to move 20-btrfs into 80-btrfs when he integrated btrfs support. -- Tomasz Torcz 72->| 80->| xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx 72->| 80->| -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
