On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Doesn't look too bad ;) judging based on very brief look at the spec file,
> but it violates the Static Library Packaging Guidelines, and I wonder
> who "owns" %{_datadir}/re?
I've removed the static library and made the package an explicit owner
of %{_datadir}/re.
> > %{_libdir}/libre.so
>
> A version-less library is less than ideal, however. How stable is the API/ABI?
Yeah, that's my feeling, too, but that's what the upstream Makefile
currently produces. I wasn't sure how invasive I should be in terms
of patching the upstream build process.
--
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
