On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 11:25:27 +0300 Susi Lehtola <jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Sep 2013 01:05:23 +0200 > Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Susi Lehtola wrote: > > > Again, you should file a bug to the FPC about this. > > > > Is this really the FPC's responsibility? I'd expect this to be the > > maintainer's, and for escalation FESCO's. > > FPC maintains packaging guidelines. If you think that BLAS/LAPACK > packages should have their own guideline, then file a proposition to > the FPC. FESCO is still there if the matter needs to be escalated from > the FPC. Also, I'd still like to remind that the case of LAPACK/BLAS is analogous to that of MPI - both follow the same standard, meaning the same symbols in different implementations of the standard. In the case of MPI there was a need to totally separate the different implementations, because otherwise esoteric problems could arise. Why would this case be different? What about runtime C libraries, should you be able to switch those as well? -- Susi Lehtola Fedora Project Contributor jussilehtola@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
