On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200 > > Jakub Filak <jfilak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text > > > produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug > > > summary format I'd like to do a little survey: > > > > > > What would you like see in the bug summaries produced by abrt? > > > > I actually disagree with the reporter of the bug. > > > > I prefer to have the component name in the subject of the bug. It's > > true that you can look this up by going to the bug on the web and that > > it's in the initial email, but after that the context of update emails > > is not there, so it's harder for me to know _which_ of the many abrt > > bugs this is. > > Please, fix/improve your email client UI. All bugzilla emails > contain all necessary information in email header: Because opening email headers is indeed so convenient. > for example: > > X-Bugzilla-Reporter: > X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ > > > For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add > > unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component This is nice and handy, but I actually don't know many client offering this opeiton. /me gonna add this option to his muttrc (lucky that I do use mutt here and there). > It's pretty common that we don't have component name in BZ summary... Which does not make it less annoying. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
