On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 11:56:26 +0200, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/da/39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709.debug > which is a symlink to: > /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/ocaml-pcre-7.0.2-5.fc21.x86_64 [...] > /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/da/39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709.debug > which is a symlink to: > /usr/lib/debug/.dwz/ocaml-gettext-0.3.4-11.fc21.x86_64 > > Obviously this prevents me from installing both debuginfo packages at > the same time. The problem is these two files have exactly the same content so they get the same build-id (which is a content hash - to be deterministic across builds). They are the same as they are completely empty: Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Address Off Size ES Flg Lk Inf Al [ 0] NULL 0000000000000000 000000 000000 00 0 0 0 [ 1] .note.gnu.build-id NOTE 0000000000000000 000040 000024 00 0 0 4 [ 2] .shstrtab STRTAB 0000000000000000 000124 000067 00 0 0 1 For normal .debug files their build-id is unique as the .debug file references source files /usr/src/debug/NAME-VERSION/... where NAME-VERSION is different for each package. (It is not, it should be NVRA and not just NV, but that is Bug 1002341 I work on these days.) But .dwz files do not reference any /usr/src/debug/ files so maybe dwz or debugedit really need an artifical build-id salt (from NVRA) for .dwz? For debugedit FChE has implemented it in: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002341#c0 Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
