On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 06:28:09 -0400 Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-09-12 at 17:39 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > > So I am confused. In your request to legal you say Release > > Engineering asked for legal to okay it. However I dont remember > > ever asking you to get legal's okay. Who in releng asked you to? > > <nirik> I'm going to not continue this, because it's not actually my > argument and I am not a lawyer. Please go talk to fedora-legal. Note that I was simply saying that this is the issue that the previous plan ran into. :) It doesn't mean thats the only issue to be overcome. > > I really do not think we can integrate this into our release > > processes right now. > > Thankfully, we're not asking for it for 'right now'. We want it for > f21. Great. I still think it would be good to look at and come to a plan sooner rather than wait for f21. (If things could get done in rawhide when they are agreed on that would be good). kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct