Great news! Thanks for doing this. Do you have the log output of the failing tests? Also, the Source0 URL doesn't work (404) with the new layout of the scala-lang website, it should now be "http://www.scala-lang.org/files/archive/scala-sources-%{fullversion}.tgz"; On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:32 AM, Will Benton <willb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I have made a spec file for Scala 2.10.1 that successfully builds under mock on F19; it is available here: > > https://github.com/willb/scala-packaging > > I had to make a new patch to account for interface changes in JLine 2.7, disable optimization (due to a known bug in the Scala optimizer), and disable several tests that failed spuriously (as far as I can tell). But I think the package should be at least as good as the one we had before. > > Jochen Schmitt, are you willing to update the build in F19 and rawhide with these fixes? > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Will Benton" <willb@xxxxxxxxxx> >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:26:23 PM >> Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive >> >> I see that scala is on the to-be-retired list unless it starts building from >> source. I am interested in using Scala in Fedora, and will take on >> maintainership (for a while, at least) if no one else is willing to fix it. >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> > From: "Jochen Schmitt" <Jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2013 6:03:46 AM >> > Subject: Re: Scala package owner unresponsive >> > >> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:41:52PM -0600, Jerry James wrote: >> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Will Benton <willb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > > > (1) As far as I can tell, the package for Scala 2.9.2 on F19 (2.9.2-2) >> > > > has broken dependencies; I can't install it via yum on my new F19 >> > > > install. Is this the case for anyone else? If so, wouldn't it be best >> > > > to have a working Scala 2.9 package in F19 and introduce 2.10 in a >> > > > later >> > > > release? >> > > >> > > Version 2.9.2-4 was built for F-18, but was never built for F-19 or >> > > F-20. The changelog entries for -3 and -4 say: >> > >> > Yes, the reason fot this is very simple. On F18 we had a jdk-1.6.0 >> > environment in >> > addition to the jdk-1.7.0. Scala was built explicitly agains jdk-1.6.0 >> > because jdk-1.7.0 >> > is not supported on this release. >> > >> > Fedora 19 and late doesn't provides a jdk-1.6.0 environment which is the >> > reason >> > for the broken dependency. So it's impossible to build scala-2.9.x for F19 >> > or >> > later releases for Fedora. >> > >> > Best Regards: >> > >> > Jochen Schmitt >> > -- >> > devel mailing list >> > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >> -- >> devel mailing list >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
